Project Material on; The impact of poor family background on the academic achievement of pupils in primary schools in Ikorodu Local Government Area of Lagos State
1.1
Introduction
The role families’ plays to the pupils at any given
point in time in a child’s life cannot be over highlighted. The family is
relevant and very significant to the well being of a child as well as his/her
later development in life. Family is the first unit in the social order where
the child’s upbringings began after birth, still in cradle. According to
Adewumi et al (2012) childhood could be liken to a letters impressed in the
shout of a young tree, which grow, and later enlarge into an integral part of
the whole. Sequel to the above, rightful beginning makes the most essential
part of every child’s upbringing/education. The contribution of the parent to
the training of the pupil determines how far he/she will go in life. It is well
noted that when the school work together with the family through learning
support system, pupils tends to succeed better not just in schools but in life.
The family is an institution as well as an agent of
socialization saddle with the responsibility of determining the pupil’s
attitude towards intellectual, religious, character and moral upbringing.
According to Aliyu (2016) the family lays the fundamentals of moral and
religious upbringing of the child, and in a way dictate how he/she relate with
others regarding the idea of right and wrong , good and bad. The family unit
plays the role of helping the pupils in determining his/her future career
pursuit through socializing them into their choice of vocation or a trade for
self reliance, by exposing the child to either pursue the career of the family
or any favorable skill before the child grow to become an adult (Jekayinka and
Oke,2003). The family here includes everything that surrounds within the family
itself and includes the family background, their socio-economic status, broken
home etc. According to Mpiluka (2014), Family backgrounds have been of immense
significant in determining the academic achievement of a child in schools all
over the world. Specifically because academic achievement often time are
motivated by the type of people the child interacts with in their early stages
in life from their homes. Muola (2010) observed that family background could be
likening to all the conditions and circumstances within the family which influences
the child physically, intellectually and emotionally as he/she grow up. The
Child that grew up from different family backgrounds are affected differently
by such family condition, which are the reasons behind why some children have
good family background while others have a very poor background. The
differences in our family background are some of the consequences in the
variation in pupil’s academic achievement in school.
Sequel to the above, primary school education
remains best and first step to human development. Also, education is one of the
basic requirements for good in a society where social vices are on the
increase. Relating education and family together, it is noted that educated
parents provide a better and good academic atmosphere for their children. In
all parts of the world primary schools is the foundation upon which other
levels and forms of education are built. For very obvious reasons, this
foundation cannot afford to be rickety, shaking and torpid. However, the issues
of pupils’ academic achievement in schools have been of great concern ever
since the introduction of modern education system in Nigeria. Many countries in
the world have realized that primary school is an integral part of educational
process without good academic achievement at this level other facet of the
society will be affected. Nyipir (2010) observed that the parents are parts of
the current challenge facing the primary school system in the world. This is
because the parents have often time fail to do their bid at home and by so
doing makes many children even at early stage in life resort to self-help as a
result of the fact their parents refuse to give them the needed attention they
deserved. As a child grew up from infant to toddler and then to a preschooler,
he/she learns how to speak, listen, write and read which are later develop in
order to make the child to achieve academic performance (Chris and Theisen,
2009). Gadsden (2003) observed that greater parental (family background)
involvement at early stage of pupil’s learning process positively affects the
pupil’s performance in school. Although, family background includes other
variables such as parental socio-economic status, broken homes, family size and
types, parental educational background etc all these are some of the
determinant of family background. Meanwhile, Ojo and Yilma (2010) noted that
socio-economic status of a family is capable of affecting pupil’s behavior and
to some extend determines their aspiration in life. Ojo et al (2010) further
opined that families having worthy socio-economic status often have more
resources in sending their children to school. Most time they usually have
access to wide range of ways of providing their children with the needed care,
books and also know how to engage them in various learning activities in the house
after school. They also have access to good quality information about their
children’s wellbeing, as well as their social, emotional and mental development
both in school and at home. Although, Ojo et al (2010) further revealed that
parental socio-economic status such as family income level are among some of
the major challenges face in the family when it comes to providing best
possible care and education for their children. Parental level of education is
another key factor that influences pupil academic achievement. The role
parental level of education plays cannot be over emphasized. According to Gary,
(2001), pupil’s that grew up under parent who are professional and are engage
in managerial occupational backgrounds exhibit higher academic performance than
those from dissimilar background.
Similarly, family size and type are also linked to
high academic achievement. Family size and type to some extent determines the
level of attention and time which a pupil gets from their parents. Financial
challenges associated with family with larger size and type could be better
explained in Okunyi (2004) findings. In Okunyi (2004), it was revealed that as
families’ increases, parents sometime cannot afford to give their children the
same level of attention compare to when the family size is manageable. In a
situation that the family size is large parent find it difficult to provide the
necessary things needed by the pupil to succeed in School. For example
provision of learning aids, comfortable rooms to stay and do their assignment
and home work, away from distraction from TV, outings to places of interest,
holiday trip, opportunity to visits tourist centers etc.
On the other side, Omoruyi (2014) observed that
growing up with a single parent family or broken home are always very
nerve-racking tasks for both the child and parent. Such families are bound to
be confronted with challenges of inadequate financial resources, lack of care,
no love etc. Schults (2006) once opined that if adult from broken homes are to
be compared to those from a united family, you will discover that those from a
more united family are more socialized, academically and emotional stable than
the other. Johnson (2005) lamented that pupils from separated homes (broken
home) families often fail in school and sometime, they are exposed to
emotionally risk compare to the others. In a sharp contrast Omoruyi (2014)
disagree with Johnson (2005) view by saying that this may not be completely
applicable in all cases of broken homes. He further opined that some pupils
irrespective of home background or structure may work hard to become successful
in life. Furthermore, Ayodele (2007) observed that the place where a child grew
up himself/herself determining his/her learning ability and ultimately his
academic achievement in school.
Sequel to the afford mentioned facts, this study is
interested in investigating influence of family background on pupil’s academic
achievement in primary schools in Ikorodu Local Government Area ,Lagos state.
1.2
Background of the Study
Education is the process of transmitting what is
worthwhile to the members of society. According to Okafor G., (2014). Education
embraces all those experiences of the individual through which knowledge is
acquired and intellect enlightened. For Nwabachili and Egbue (2015) education
is what goes on from one generation to another. In this context, education is
the process of socializing the child to grow up as a fulfilled member of the
society through the informal, formal, and non-formal processes. Informal
education is the process of acquiring knowledge about the environment and
beyond through living with one another. According to Nwabachili and Egbue
(2015), formal education is a consciously planned form of socialization in a
formal setting such as school. The stress that non-formal education involves
all those systematic programmes and processes of education and training that
are done outside formal education settings. All these forms of education cannot
be achieved without the influence of the family.
Family is the first social environment that the
child finds him/herself. According to Clifford (2016) family remains the
primary environment of the child. The author emphasized that the family
environment has more chances of increasing or decreasing the intellectual
achievement of the child. Akubuo and Okolo (2010), defined a family as a small
kinship structural group with the key function of natural socialization of the
newborn. Similarly, in Okunniyi (2010), family is defined as a primary social
group of parents, offspring and possibly other members of the household. Family
background refers to all the conditions and circumstances in the family which
influence the child physically, intellectually and emotionally; Moula (2010).
Children coming from differently by such family background while some have poor
background citing Fleege, Eke (2012) noted that with some families, the
background way vary from time to time for the same individuals. Formal
education therefore remains the vehicle for human development which must start
from the family. There are different categories of families. The major
categories of families. The major categories of families. The major categories
of families according to Anderson and Taylor (2007) includes;
Traditional families – where the father is the major
bread winner and mother at homes raising children;
Divorce families – families that have been
reconstituted following the breaking of marriage;
Single parent families – likely headed by women;
step families – with new siblings and new parents stemming from re-marriage.
A family could also be categorized as extended or
nuclear. Extended families are those in which large group are related kin in
addition to parents and children live together in the same household. This is
the type of family prevalent in African countries. Nuclear families are
families are families where married couple resides together with their
children. This type of family is common in western countries Anderson and
Taylor (2000). Families are of various size. Family size has to do with the
total number of people in a single family which may include the father, mother,
children and even the extended members – all living in one hamlet.
According to Alion (2014) family size has
implication for education. The author emphasized that the size of the family
determines to a great extent the relative amount of physical attention and time
which each child gets from his parents. large families may suffer poverty and
lack parental encouragement and stimulus which motivate their academic
achievement (Eamon, 2010). Similarly, smaller family size has been linked with
high academic achievement (Majoribank, 2012) Majoribank further stressed that
students with fewer siblings are likely to receive more parental attention and
have support that leads to better school performance. Family (small or large
size) remains the primary environment of every child. The families begin the
process of education and provide physical and psychological needs of the child.
This supports the view of Maduewisi (2023), that the environmental experiences
from family, peer group and school location have great influence in determining
a child’s intellectual ability. She maintained that brought children from under
– privileged family environment may turn dull due to impoverished family
environment. Another aspect of family environmental factor is the structure of
the family. Structurally, a family is either broken or intact. A broken family
in this context is one that is not structurally intact for various reasons;
such as death of a parent, divorce, separation, desertion and illegitimacy in
which case, the family was never completed (Coukline 2015). In single parent
families, children may suffer from psychological and social problems which
affects their academic performance. Danesy and Okedian (2012) in their study,
lamented that street hawking among pupils of primary schools have
psychologically imposed other problems, such as sex networking behaviour,
juvenile delinquent behaviour, which take much of the pupil’s school time that
necessitated the poor academic performance and drop out syndrome notice among
pupils of primary school.
According to (Jeynes 2002), the Socio-Economic
Status (SES) of a child is most commonly determined by combining parent’s
educational level, occupational status and income level. Social class and
economic status of the parents determine the type of school and the standard of
training they desire for their children. The occupation or profession of the
parents, the educational level and whether the mothers are working or
non-working mothers places them at an advantage or disadvantage to evaluate
their children’s academic work and monitor their progress. Status is often
determined by the individual’s economic attainment, though it is sometimes
ascribed on the individual. Okunniyi (2010), identified three distinct
socio-economic groups or status which are common in many countries. They are;
upper class – which is made up or rich businessmen and top government officials
among others; middles class – which consists of skilled workers, professionals
sand middle ranked government workers and the lower class – which is made up of
manual workers, petty traders and low income government officials. Francis (2012)
posits that the lower income families may be aware of the importance of
education in the society but at the same time, they are also aware of their
limited resources to measure up with such educational demands. According to the
author, a family that can scarcely provide for the basic needs of the family
which include food, shelter and clothing will hardly motivate the children
instead they will pressurize their children to seek for job opportunities with
the little education they acquired so
far to support the family. The implication of the agreement is that some
families are likely to give their children poor academic background because of
lack of financial support.
Parent’s motivation is and other family background
factor which influence the academic performance of pupils. Pupils under
motivated condition, exhibits purposeful behaviour aimed at achieving academic
set goals. The achievement of these goals determines the motive. Hickey and
Lindsley (2010) clearly distinguished two perspectives. According to them,
disposition perspective asks questions about pupil’s general orientation to
learning which relates to the pupils’ priority and pupil’s nature. The
situational perspective according to the scholars focuses on learning context.
These scholars further identified to factors that greatly influence pupil’s
motivation. These are: interpersonal factors such as curiosity, perseverance
and autonomy (intrinsic-factors) such as parents, peers and siblings (extrinsic
factors).
Pupils with fewer siblings are likely to receive
more parental attention and motivation and thus have more access to resources
than additional attention and motivation leads to better school performance
(Majoribanks, 2012, Thondike, 1997 and 2005). Thondike reorganizes seven ways
of motivating pupils viz; awareness on the part of the parents of the value of
education whether such parents are literate or illiterate; existence of books,
newspapers, comic books, good nutrition and sleeping habit; adequate facilities
for satisfaction of physical needs like foods, shelter and clothing; objects in
the home which challenges the child’s curiosity. Okwulanya (2015) postulated
that motivation from educated parents strengthens the academic performance and
language development in their children to perform better in their academic
activities. Parental occupation is also an important family background
variable. The occupation of one’s parents may determine to a large extent one’s
opportunity to attend primary school or not. Ezasi (2013) noted that parents like
their children to take to their occupation, like Lawyers, doctors, musicians
among others.
Uwaoma (2006) asserted that most vocational students
where children whose parents where farmers and craftmen. In Nigeria most
children whose parents cannot afford to pay for high cost of formal education
enroll into apprenticeship programme such as carpentry, bricklaying, petty
trading and others. In the study area, there is a seeming general poor
performance among pupils in primary school. Evidences of the poor performances
are seen in both pupils international and external examination. It is against
this backdrop that the researcher is interested in investigating the family
background and pupil’s academic performance in primary schools in Ikorodu Local
Educational Authority of Akwa Ibom State.
1.3
Statement of the Problem
Over the years, there
has been poor performance of pupils in Ikorodu Local Education Authority in
both internal and external examinations. Also, parents with low level of
income, finds it difficult to provide learning materials such as note books,
text books, school bags, sandals good uniform, etc for their ward(s). This is
due to the fact that they don’t earn high and even if they do, these materials
are too expensive for them to afford it. They therefore leave the child to cope
the way he or she can with the available learning materials. This alone makes
most of the children in these areas (zone) not to perform very well in their
academics.
Furthermore, most children came from a very large
family size, where the parents finds it uneasy to cater for all the academic
needs of children, due to several demands
from both the children and other family members. Where the family size
is large, and the income level of the parent is low, the tendency of the
parents providing for the children cannot be guaranteed. This is because, as
the family size is large so also diverse problems exist in the home. Moreover,
as the family size is large, most parents would not be able to go through each
child’s work before and after school as they might consider it as waste of
time.
So also, parents with low level of education would
find it difficult to assess their children’s work, before and after school,
this is because they only have little or no idea about their children’s
performance. A parent that is uneducated (illiterate) would lack the technical
know-how of guiding the child at home, especially in the area of aiding the
child to do homework. Now a days in most schools, homework is been considered
as a tool for assessing a child’s performance, where the homework is left
unattended by the parents, due to their inability to aid the child, it therefore
means that the child would either do it haphazardly or left it undone and this
would lead to the poor performance of the child. Moreso, parents with low level
of education does not demand for progress report of their children from the
school in which they attend, this is because they lack basic educational
knowledge.
Finally, parents on prestigious occupation like
doctor, nurse, lawyer, etc would want their children to take up their
occupation and their children or child might not have that ability to take up
such. Also some parents are so busy due to the nature of their job, some goes
out early in the morning and comes back at night, while the children must have
slept. Thereby not been able to attend to the children’s work. And as such, the
children only wake up the next day and go back to school unattended. This alone
makes children to perform poorly in their academic performance. These findings
seek to provide solutions to the problems leading to pupil’s poor performance
and to provide recommendations to parents, government and private sectors that
are educationally driven.
1.4 Objectives of the Study
The purpose of the study is to examine influence of poor
family background on pupil’s academic achievement in primary schools in Ikorodu
LGA of Lagos state. Specifically, the study will attempt to find out the
following objectives;
1)
To ascertain whether poor family
background has any influence on pupil’s academic achievement in Primary schools
in Ikorodu LGA of Lagos State.